March was a wacky month - filled with viruses (computer and human) that slowed down my progress here and elsewhere. I've had dozens of things I'd like to write about, but not the energy nor a computer that could keep up with a little word processing.
I'm grateful to finally be recovered - just a little cough for me, a little hiccup here and there for the computer (but I blame Microsoft for that). Now if I could just figure out what's happening with my cell phone...
There are untold adages about how things happen in sets (or groups of sets), and any one of them would fit the last few weeks for me. In particular, it's been a month of "big" babies. Two of my students gave birth to girls who weighed more than eight pounds -- a hearty congratulations to both families on their wonderful new daughters! -- and two clients are currently wrestling with their physicians over inducing their babies early because of estimated weight.
In my years as a childbirth instructor and doula, I've worked with a number of moms who've given birth to babies larger than nine pounds...often without a perineal tear. I've been there for the rare occasion when a baby could only be born by c-section, but I've seen many, many more moms give birth to big babies with no complications, no anesthesia and no undue stress.
So it disturbs me to see more doctors trying to convince women to induce because they think the baby might be large. In the vast majority of situations, a mom allowed to labor the way her body needs to -- even if the resulting labor is longer than average -- can give birth to her baby without surgery. Even if the birth results in a c-section, the benefits to the baby of going through a trial of labor are substantial. Labor massages the baby's organs, resulting in a baby who's better able to breathe and otherwise function after birth.
Physicians are scheduling more ultrasounds late in pregnancy, which allows them to use the "the baby's too big!" argument to justify induction. Late-pregnancy ultrasounds are often less-than-accurate at determining the baby's size or gestational age (in which late-term ultrasounds may be off by as much as 21 days).
In 2006, a group of London researchers looked at this issue -- performing ultrasounds to estimate the weights of 262 babies immediately before labor was induced. Using two common formulas for measuring, they found that ultrasound estimates were off by more than 10 percent in 38-58 percent of cases. Ultimately, doctors were more accurate guessing baby's weight than using ultrasound to try to determine it, the study concluded.* Moms were more accurate in some cases at guesses their own baby's weight than one of the two ultrasound formulas tested. "All four (estimates) were significantly different from birth weight," the study concluded.
Some doctors tell women they need to induce early or schedule an early c-section because a big (or macrosomic) baby could be damaged by the birth process. However, it seems that these procedures aren't making a difference in the health of babies or moms.
In a 2005 article in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology**, authors note: "Among uncomplicated pregnancies, there is sufficient evidence that suspected macrosomia is not an indication for induction or for primary cesarean delivery."
As much as the labor process benefits babies, waiting to be born until the baby is ready is of a huge health benefit to the baby as well. The March of Dimes is currently campaigning to educate physicians about the differences in the brain of a baby born before 40 weeks and that of a baby born at 40 weeks or after. The differences are significant, the organization reports. For example, the baby's brain at 35 weeks is only two-thirds the size of a 40-week brain. Babies born early have poor feeding reflexes and are more likely to suffer learning and behavioral problems, according to the March of Dimes.
I often wonder marvel at the disconnect that seems to exist between those doctors who birth the baby (Yes, I know, it's the mom who births the baby, not the doctor!) and those who take care of it once it's born. It seems unlikely that doctors would push so hard to induce babies if they thought about the lingering effects for children and parents.
* Original Paper
Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birth weight prior to induction of labor at term
E. Peregrine, P. O'Brien, E. Jauniaux
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
** American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2005 Aug;193(2):332-46.
Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review.
Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, Chauhan VB, Chang G, Magann EF, Hendrix NW.
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, Spartanburg, SC, USA.
Showing posts with label birth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label birth. Show all posts
Friday, March 26, 2010
Monday, March 1, 2010
I Never Thought I'd Be Here
I never planned on being an advocate. My general belief is that right usually prevails...that when individuals fight for what they need and believe in (at least in the U.S.), they have an opportunity to make great things happen. Who needs an advocate when you can handle it yourself? It's simple, sure. But it's also often true.
But here I am, practically by accident, advocating for the common good on behalf of those who can't or won't. That's not a far leap, I suppose, for a former newspaper reporter. As a journalist, I believed in the public's right to know - that an informed public would use fairly presented information to rally for change when change was needed. Now I'm not so sure.
I find myself in this place not because my sense of righteousness is inherently wrong -- I still believe in informed individuals' abilities to make good things happen. But, I've learned that a majority of people often aren't informed -- they don't seem to understand (or maybe don't care) that they might need to fight for change. Too many of us don't know we have choices. We've become a society that often lives for the status quo... even when the status quo has stopped working.
I look around me and I see a need for change -- for improvement -- in many areas of American society. I don't have time or energy to be a scatter-shot advocate, so I've chosen to focus on a few things that I can affect on both personal and global levels.
Shortly after I left journalism to be with my newborn son, I realized that the vast majority of parents in the U.S. don't realize they probably need to be making informed choices in pregnancy and birth because those choices may affect the health of their families in the long term. Many parents don't understand that there are serious ramifications to not making choices, and leave the decision-making to health care providers who are often procedure-and-medication happy. By failing to ask questions -- by participating in the births of children in absentia -- parents are giving up their first opportunity to weigh in on the welfare of their children.
I became a childbirth educator and doula (someone who helps laboring parents through the birth process) so that I could help families understand those choices. I am happy knowing that my assistance has made things better for some parents and babies in a very concrete way -- surgeries avoided, wishes honored, babies healthy. But the number of families I personally can work with in a year is less than the number of babies born on a busy day in two or three of my city's busiest hospitals.
My individual call for change is part of a worldwide phenomenon, really. Around the world, women and their partners are standing up for the right of choice. I'm hoping that if I add one more loud voice to that ongoing discussion, we'll collectively force good changes in the status quo.
I'll use this space to talk about the research and share my thoughts, and in the process I hope that someone (including me!) will learn something. From time to time I'll talk about things that have nothing to do with pregnancy or birth -- and in some of those off-topic observations I'll still be advocating, but sometimes I'll just be making observations.
Ultimately, I wish there was no need for people like me to advocate for healthy options in pregnancy and birth or for parental informed consent. Do I really want to be here? No. But since the need exists, I can't imagine being anywhere else.
But here I am, practically by accident, advocating for the common good on behalf of those who can't or won't. That's not a far leap, I suppose, for a former newspaper reporter. As a journalist, I believed in the public's right to know - that an informed public would use fairly presented information to rally for change when change was needed. Now I'm not so sure.
I find myself in this place not because my sense of righteousness is inherently wrong -- I still believe in informed individuals' abilities to make good things happen. But, I've learned that a majority of people often aren't informed -- they don't seem to understand (or maybe don't care) that they might need to fight for change. Too many of us don't know we have choices. We've become a society that often lives for the status quo... even when the status quo has stopped working.
I look around me and I see a need for change -- for improvement -- in many areas of American society. I don't have time or energy to be a scatter-shot advocate, so I've chosen to focus on a few things that I can affect on both personal and global levels.
Shortly after I left journalism to be with my newborn son, I realized that the vast majority of parents in the U.S. don't realize they probably need to be making informed choices in pregnancy and birth because those choices may affect the health of their families in the long term. Many parents don't understand that there are serious ramifications to not making choices, and leave the decision-making to health care providers who are often procedure-and-medication happy. By failing to ask questions -- by participating in the births of children in absentia -- parents are giving up their first opportunity to weigh in on the welfare of their children.
I became a childbirth educator and doula (someone who helps laboring parents through the birth process) so that I could help families understand those choices. I am happy knowing that my assistance has made things better for some parents and babies in a very concrete way -- surgeries avoided, wishes honored, babies healthy. But the number of families I personally can work with in a year is less than the number of babies born on a busy day in two or three of my city's busiest hospitals.
My individual call for change is part of a worldwide phenomenon, really. Around the world, women and their partners are standing up for the right of choice. I'm hoping that if I add one more loud voice to that ongoing discussion, we'll collectively force good changes in the status quo.
I'll use this space to talk about the research and share my thoughts, and in the process I hope that someone (including me!) will learn something. From time to time I'll talk about things that have nothing to do with pregnancy or birth -- and in some of those off-topic observations I'll still be advocating, but sometimes I'll just be making observations.
Ultimately, I wish there was no need for people like me to advocate for healthy options in pregnancy and birth or for parental informed consent. Do I really want to be here? No. But since the need exists, I can't imagine being anywhere else.
Labels:
birth,
birth options,
informed consent,
natural childbirth,
pregnancy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
